A friend pointed out to me that it might be more useful, rather than just deleting podcasts and such and ranting on the Internet about it, that I at least try to address the folks behind these things first.
So, my Christmas resolution is to be willing to give some of these shows another chance ... and also to be willing to stand up and say "you were sexist/racist/etc. in this week's episode and here's how" directly to the people involved.
This may well be me trying to find a justification for not having to stop enjoying things that are problematic. But I still can't decide whether it is or not, so I'm going to press forward and possibly make a fool of myself. Godspeed, as they say.
EDIT: Have sent one e-mail, to the podcaster that I feel might be the most open to my criticism. We shall see. (Assuming anything happens at all.)
So, my Christmas resolution is to be willing to give some of these shows another chance ... and also to be willing to stand up and say "you were sexist/racist/etc. in this week's episode and here's how" directly to the people involved.
This may well be me trying to find a justification for not having to stop enjoying things that are problematic. But I still can't decide whether it is or not, so I'm going to press forward and possibly make a fool of myself. Godspeed, as they say.
EDIT: Have sent one e-mail, to the podcaster that I feel might be the most open to my criticism. We shall see. (Assuming anything happens at all.)
Is there no end to it?
Dec. 22nd, 2009 11:05 pm(Crossposted to LJ.)
So, I just got around to watching that epic 70-minute-long review of The Phantom Menace that everyone's been raving about. And I get 17 minutes in, to discover that the reviewer expects me to find it amusing that his narrator "character" has ( TRIGGER WARNING )
I find this sort of thing CRITICAL NEED-TO-KNOW INFORMATION when being presented with a YouTube video.
So, if you haven't seen it yet, I strongly strongly advise against it. I feel sick.
So, I just got around to watching that epic 70-minute-long review of The Phantom Menace that everyone's been raving about. And I get 17 minutes in, to discover that the reviewer expects me to find it amusing that his narrator "character" has ( TRIGGER WARNING )
I find this sort of thing CRITICAL NEED-TO-KNOW INFORMATION when being presented with a YouTube video.
So, if you haven't seen it yet, I strongly strongly advise against it. I feel sick.
Have now had to stop listening to both Comedy Death Ray Radio[1] and Marc Maron's WTFPodcast[2]. Maybe Nick Kroll can come on Never Not Funny and do a Charlie Chan impression, so I can get all comedy podcasts out of my life forever. (I actually cut NNF too much slack already, since I've loved it for so long and pay money for it.)
Dammit.
[1] White person playing a black character: can be problematic, but doesn't necessarily HAVE to be a disaster. White person then proceeding to say the N-word: oh f*ck no.
[2] You say "retarded", and I cringe. Then you start talking about why it's wrong, and I actually feel hope. Then you keep saying it anyway, and I delete.
Dammit.
[1] White person playing a black character: can be problematic, but doesn't necessarily HAVE to be a disaster. White person then proceeding to say the N-word: oh f*ck no.
[2] You say "retarded", and I cringe. Then you start talking about why it's wrong, and I actually feel hope. Then you keep saying it anyway, and I delete.
If I keep up blogging about this stuff, expect my inner swearer to come out often.
Oct. 4th, 2009 03:32 pmI'm listening to the latest episode of the podcast Comedy and Everything Else, a show which I have found entertaining for quite a while. And then I hear this shit:
( Warning: Hateful fat-woman "jokes" under the cut )
Deleting the episode. Deleting my subscription. I would tell them all this on their website, but I really doubt it would do any good, and I would get 500 responses of "can't you take a joke" and I would just want to break things in my rage.
( Warning: Hateful fat-woman "jokes" under the cut )
Deleting the episode. Deleting my subscription. I would tell them all this on their website, but I really doubt it would do any good, and I would get 500 responses of "can't you take a joke" and I would just want to break things in my rage.
Trigger warning--what I'm linking to involves someone's opinion of the Roman Polanski arrest.
I find this to be fucked up. Specifically, the beginning and end of the second paragraph, and the end of the third paragraph (which is a joke that I get, but still).
Am I wrong?
(Also posted in my LJ. But this is the kind of crap I've really been thinking of using my DW account to talk about.)
I find this to be fucked up. Specifically, the beginning and end of the second paragraph, and the end of the third paragraph (which is a joke that I get, but still).
Am I wrong?
(Also posted in my LJ. But this is the kind of crap I've really been thinking of using my DW account to talk about.)
This is not really news.
Sep. 19th, 2009 11:54 pm1) I continue to kick around the idea of using this account as a *clears throat* "Blog of Importance". Basically, I would post here about stuff that I don't think my LJ flist would necessarily want to read about just because they're following me. (Not that I wouldn't want them to read it if they're interested, of course.) I have polarizing interests! Fear me.
2) My third-party solution for getting LJ entries to display functionally in Google Reader seems to have just added Dreamwidth. Yaaaaaaay! This means I can finally start getting my RSS on w/r/t DW journals. This is very good.
2) My third-party solution for getting LJ entries to display functionally in Google Reader seems to have just added Dreamwidth. Yaaaaaaay! This means I can finally start getting my RSS on w/r/t DW journals. This is very good.